RUSE: "an action intended to mislead, deceive, or trick; stratagem"
I'd like to believe that FOX News isn't "part of the ruse," but their reporting on the lawsuits against Arizona, Alabama, and ObamaCare has been anything but "fair and balanced."
Does FOX News have ANY Constitutional lawyers/scholars on the payroll besides Judge Napolitano? The resumes of Megyn Kelly and Greta van Susteren would make one think they knew what they were talking about, and yet, their "slobbering love affair" (sorry Mr. Goldberg) with the high court has either clouded their objectivity and judgment, OR management won't let them tell the truth.
Either way, they are part of the "ruse"
Case in point (1):
If Bill O'Reilly and Megyn Kelly had "really" wanted to be fair and balanced in their discussion Thursday night about the federal judge's ruling in the Alabama case they would have discussed WHY this judge was even hearing the case since she has ZERO Constitutional authority to do so. They would have warned the American People that they were being sold a pig in a poke; that the ruling was null and void upon its inception, just like an un-Constitutional law is, but they didn't do that. (See U.S. Constitution, Article III, Section 2, Clause 2, and Article I, Section 10, Clause 3.)
U.S. Constitution, Article III, Section 2, Clause 2:
"In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make."
U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 10, Clause 3:
"No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay."
Case in point (2):
On Friday night, Greta van Susteren had Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli on for the hundredth time (exaggeration, I've lost count) whining about his court case against ObamaCare. NOT ONCE has Greta asked the very likeable Virginia AG why he didn't uphold his oath and file his lawsuit directly in the Supreme Court where the Constitution authorizes such a case to be heard "in the first instance." That, ladies and gents, is what "original jurisdiction" means, but no, Greta hasn't done that.
In fact, NONE of the talking heads on FOX News have taken our public servants to task for usurping the Constitution with these dog-and-pony kangaroo court cases. NEVER.
Why is that? Our legal and Constitutional scholars haven't "clerked" for a Supreme Court justice, but at least one of them has been trying cases before it for half a century and is a trustee of the Supreme Court Historical Society.
Cuccinelli admitted to Greta Friday night that he knew "all along" that the Supreme Court would have to decide whether ObamaCare is Constitutional or not, and yet he has squandered hundreds of thousands, if not millions of Virginia taxpayer dollars fighting a case he was REQUIRED by his voluntary oath to file in the Supreme Court in the first place, AND HE KNEW THAT TOO!
Do you hear me? Cuccinelli KNEW the Constitution protected Virginia's sovereign right (and that of the other States) to have their grievances heard ONLY in the U.S. Supreme Court. That's what the Constitution says, not me. I didn't write it, but I DID take an oath to support and defend it against ALL enemies, foreign and domestic, just like Ken Cuccinelli did.
So why would gentlemanly Ken refuse to do his duty? It's simple. It's called "face time," and "personal political capital" to be gleened from milking out the dispute between Virginia and the federal government.
Try a case in one court... doesn't take years. Try a case in several courts as you wind through the judicial system, and you can milk it out for all it's worth.
The same can be said of ALL the players on both sides of ALL the cases, including the 26 State Attorneys General who are embroiled in the Florida suit against ObamaCare, the players in Alabama and Arizona on BOTH SIDES of the issue, and all the legal ambulance chasers writing amicus briefs for various "friends of the court."
Why is FOX News participating? Follow the ratings it brings them as each treasonous judge makes a ruling that brings the public servant usurpers back on their shows to discuss it. In essence, follow the money.
Yes. I said "treasonous judges," because, according to U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Marshall, that is exactly what they are.
According to Chief Justice Marshall, and I'll paraphrase here for brevity's sake, "to take authority the court doesn't have, or to refuse to exercise authority the court does have... to do either is "treason to the Constitution."
The liberal sheep listen to their liberal sheep-herders on MSNBC, and the conservative sheep listen to their conservative sheep-herders on FOX News.
They both play us for suckers, preying on our liberal or conservative convictions to sway our opinions to be in synch with their goals and objectives.
Why am I so hard on Bill, Greta, Ken, and Megyn? Because they know better. Their discretion has been "informed" through "education" as Jefferson advised, and yet, they'd rather scoop up another 30 pieces of silver as they betray the trust of the American people.
Arizona's Governor Brewer? Just as guilty. A reliable and trusted source that couldn't be any closer to the SB-1070 case confided that it was a "strategic" decision to not take our advice and tell the Holder Justice Department to go pack sand.
Notice I said "strategic" and didn't say "lawful" or "Constitutional." STRATEGIC!
Remember the definition of "ruse?"
RUSE: "an action intended to mislead, deceive, or trick; stratagem"
The fourth estate (media) are supposed to be the Paul Reveres, sounding the alarm when our liberties and freedoms are being trampled, but we are being intentionally misled, deceived, and tricked, and it's all part of various strategies by the usual suspects in power (on the left and right side of the aisle of shame).
Bill, you can't give enough of your ill-gotten booty to charity to erase the harm you do to our Constitution on a daily basis by your inaction. I would say inept, but you're a Harvard grad. You should know better.
Megyn, you clerked for who is arguably the most honorable man on the Supreme Court, Justice Clarence Thomas, and yet you regularly, just like Bill and Greta, mislead the American people into believing you. We all want to believe you. You're adorable, intelligent, articulate, well-schooled, etc... You should be ashamed. All of you. I ain't buying the ruse, and as much good that FOX News does, when it comes to issues that scream out for Paul or Paula Revere, you come up short.
The clowns at News Corp ran off the only honest man they had working for them: Glenn Beck. He didn't always get it right, but I do believe that he was trying to.
How about trying a new approach: FAIR AND HONEST.
For "fair and honest" information on where and why all of these court cases should have been heard in the Supreme Court, read the "scarlet letters" at REJOINORDIE.COM.
If you are a U.S. Citizen PLEASE, get educated on this, and call your Congressman, Senators, and demand they amend 28 USC 1251, 1331, and 1345 to halt these un-Constitutional court cases!
If you want more information, contact me at: Jeff@patriotcoalition.com
God bless America and those with enough backbone and integrity to defend her!
RCG-PRIME.pdf (166.35 kb) (Proposed changes to fix un-Constitutional statues in Title 28)
REJOINORDIE.pdf (520.71 kb) (Scarlet letters to Gov. Brewer, Va. AG Cuccinelli, and Chief Justice Roberts)
Original-Jurisdiction-3-2a.ppt (4.43 mb) (Detailed PowerPoint presentation on original jurisdiction)
Subscribe